BAPCPA – Page 3 – Rochester Bankruptcy and Debt Relief

Bankruptcy Planning, Debt and 401(k)

Once in a while, I hear from debtors who tells me that they expended all or nearly all of their retirement savings trying to avoid bankruptcy. Unfortunately, if you spend your retirement funds trying to avoid bankruptcy, you cannot get it back. If, ultimately, the use of those retirement funds was insufficient to avoid bankruptcy, that money was simply wasted if the debtor still needs to file either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

As I have written previously, 401(k) and most other retirement plans are exempt in bankruptcy. What that means is that if the debtor engaged in some bankruptcy planning and filed bankruptcy before withdrawing retirement funds, the debtor would be able to keep those retirement funds and discharge his or her debts.

I understand why debtors spend their retirement money on debts that would otherwise be dischargeable in bankruptcy. Usually, they want to repay their debts and they will employ any available means to do so. While most debtors are aware of bankruptcy as an option, most debtors try to avoid it.

Since bankruptcy gives you a chance to discharge your debt and protect the assets such as retirement funds, it may be foolish to spend all of your retirement money, and I advise debtors to explore their options before making these decisions. The most important question that the debtors should ask and answer is whether their necessary and reasonable living expenses and debt payments exceed their take home income on a regular basis. If so, is this going to change because of increased income or decreased expenses in the foreseeable future?

If the debtor is left with a permanent deficit and does not expect it to change, then it does not make sense to withdraw retirement funds to continue to pay down that deficit until there is no retirement money left. The bankruptcy system, both New York and federal exemptions, protects your retirement funds.

If you are contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, New York, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Upcoming Changes to the Means Test Figures

Once again, the means test figures for median income are changing as of November 1, 2011. In New York, it means that the amount of income that the debtor can have before being forced into a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is going to decrease.

Through October 31, 2011, a single debtor in New York could have $46,295 in income in income and still be able to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Starting November 1, 2011, that figure is decreasing to $45,931. Similar decreases will take place for all family sizes. The comparison of the existing and new income limits is below.

Old Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$46,295 $57,777 $68,396 $83,942

New Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$45,931 $56,113 $66,953 $81,212

* Add $7,500 for each individual in excess of 4.

While the decreases are not large, they are going to make it more difficult for some individuals and families to qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

The figures used for the each state’s median income are based on United States Census data, and adopted by the Office of the United States Trustee. Usually, these figures are adjusted based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers once or twice per year.

When the economy is growing, typically income rises because of the cost of living increases, inflation and other reasons. When the economy is not growing, income actually decreased from the prior year. As a result, the means test is adjusted and lower median income figures are used which make it more difficult for debtors to qualify for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

Failure to Compete Financial Management Course and Denial of Discharge

Sometimes debtor’s bankruptcy case ban be closed without a discharge. The most likely reason for this the debtor’s failure to complete the financial management course. As a part of BAPCPA, the Congress required that every debtor to complete a financial management course before receiving a discharge in bankruptcy. This requirement applies to both Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cases. The class completion certificate must be filed with the court no later than 60 days following debtor’s meeting of creditors (otherwise known as 341 meeting). The certificate is usually filed with Form 23 which provides additional information to the court regarding completion of the course. If the debtor does not complete the course on time, and the bankruptcy attorney could not file the certificate, the bankruptcy court will close the case without discharge.

This is really the worst outcome possible in a bankruptcy case since the petition and all of the work done on the case was done for nothing. When the court closes the case without discharge, the automatic stay ends, and there is no discharge protecting debtor and his income and assets from his creditors. If the case is closed without discharge, creditors can begin calling and sending letters once again.

However, if the court closes the case without discharge, this problem can be solved. The debtor need to immediately do the following: complete the financial management course and then have his attorney prepare Form 23, and file it with the court. Additionally, debtor’s bankruptcy attorney will need to prepare and file a motion to reopen the bankruptcy case. The debtor and his attorney will need to appear at the motion. Once the motion is granted by the judge, bankruptcy attorney will have to submit an order for the judge to sign granting reopening of the case.

If the error in not filing the certificate of debtor education is on the part of the bankruptcy attorney, then the attorney should pay the filing fee and assume the fees for the motion and the hearing. If the mistake was on the part of the debtor, the debtor should be prepared to pay the filing fee, fees to the attorney for drafting and filing the motion to reopen the case, and for his time to attend the motion.

In my experience, this is one problem that is extremely easy to avoid. In my practice, I calendar the 60 day deadline and start calling my clients who have not provided me with a certificate within 45 days after the meeting of the creditors. Debtors should not wait until the last minute to complete the financial management course since they can do it anytime after the case is filed. That way you avoid the notice that you had your bankruptcy case closed without discharge.

If you are contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy and Creditors’ Chain of Title

It is fairly common for Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 debtors to have credit cards that went into default some time ago. It is also common for credit card issuers to sell of delinquent credit card accounts.

In Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, all creditors are notified of the bankruptcy filing and can file claims. It is common for a new entity to file a proof of claim as successor or assignee of the original credit card issuer, but often such proof of claim does not include any evidence that the claim was, in fact, assigned. This situation is commonly referred to as a missing chain of title, missing proof that the claim has been legally transferred or assigned to the new owner.

Here in Rochester, United States Bankruptcy Court Judge John C. Ninfo II has issued several decisions addressing this issue. In one of them, In re Doherty and In re Benedetti, he held that in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, the successor creditor was obligated to prove it was the legal holder of the claim.

In Doherty, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee filed his objection to the successor creditor’s claim arguing that (1) successor creditor was not scheduled as a creditor in the petition; (2) although the debtors had scheduled the creditors that the successor creditor alleged originally held the claims, there was no breakdown in the proofs of claim to support the amounts alleged to be due,which differed from the amounts the debtors had scheduled; and (3) there was no assignment or bill of sale produced to demonstrate that the successor creditor was the current holder of any of the claims that were alleged to have been sold and assigned to it.

Judge Ninfo held that the successor has failed to produce a chain of title from the alleged original holders of the claims to it by either a series of assignments or bills of sale, or by any other acceptable proof of ownership. As a result, he disallowed successor creditor’s claims, since there was no proof that it was a proper creditor entitled to file a proof of claim under Section 501 of the Bankruptcy Code.

This issue can be extremely important in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cases where it may impact duration of the plan as well as the amount of money paid by debtors under the plan. In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, this issue becomes particularly significant in asset cases, i.e., situations where debtors have nonexempt assets that the bankruptcy trustee may sell to pay the creditors.

Treatment of Social Security Benefits in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

I have previously written that Social Security income, whether retirement, survivor benefits, SSI or Social Security disability are not included in debtor’s income for the purposes of means testing. While not included in the means test figures, do the debtors have to include such payments in their Chapter 13 Bankruptcy plan and use that income toward making their plan payments?

According to a decision from the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York, a Chapter 13 Plan can be confirmed despite not including Social Security retirement income. In In Re Burnett, together with its companion case, In re Uzailkos, the proposed payment plans did not include social security income on Schedule I. As filed, the Burnett plan projected paying usecured creditors 10% of their claims, Uzailko’s plan proposed to pay creditors 37%.

Because social security income was not included, the Burnett’s Schedule I income exceeded Schedule J expenses by $493,67. If social security was included, the income available for repayment would increase by $878 to $1,371.67. For Uzailko, the available payment amount would increase $400.25 to $1,496.25.

The Chapter 13 Trustee filed objections to both plans arguing that the cases were not filed in “good faith” because social security income was not included in calculating the minimum plan payment. A “good faith” objection is the general objection to confirmation of a Chapter 13 Plan. Under the Bankruptcy Code Section 1325(a)(3), a plan which fails to pay this disposable income minimum can be denied confirmation on the grounds the debtor’s plan was not filed in good faith.

Social security income different from other forms of income under BAPCPA. Under BAPCPA, Section 101(10A) was modified to exclude Social Security benefits from the the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy means test and the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy disposable income test.

After reviewing different lines of cases addressing these issues, the court accepted the reasoning in a series of cases that held that the treatment of social security income in BAPCPA’s disposable income test precluded requiring a chapter 13 debtor to apply social security income in a plan. Accordingly, as there were no other ‘bad faith’ factors in Burnett and Uzalko cases, the judge confirmed the plans over the trustee’s objections.

If you contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Meeting of Creditors and Debtors’ Duty to Provide Bank Statements

Debtors who filed Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cases are required to provide certain documents to the trustee prior to the Meeting of Creditors. It is responsibility of bankruptcy attorneys to make sure that all of the required documents are collected in advance and provided to the trustee ahead of the meeting.

According to Bankruptcy Rule 4002, the trustee must be provided sixty days of pay stubs and the most recent tax return. In addition, debtors who own real estate that they intend on keeping must provide the trustee with some kind of valuation or appraisal. Here in Rochester, bankruptcy trustees also require copies of deed, mortgage, if any, as well as the most recent mortgage statement.

In addition, Bankruptcy Rule 4002 requires the debtor to bring to the Meeting of Creditors all bank and other financial account statements showing the balances in the accounts on the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. All bankruptcy trustees here in Rochester adhere to this rule. Turning the statements over at the meeting of creditors will save debtors time and will allow the trustee to resolve any issues related to exempt funds.

If debtors do not have such statements and are unable to obtain them from their bank, Bankruptcy Rule 4002 provides a solution by allowing debtors to submit a verified statement to that effect.

Importance of Providing Accurate Information in Your Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules

I have previously written how important it is for debtors to provide their bankruptcy attorney with accurate and complete information. Debtors have an absolute obligation under the Bankruptcy Code to disclose their assets, liabilities and income to the bankruptcy court. Once in a while, a debtor may forget a creditor or overlook an old debt. Not every debt appears on the credit report either. When a debt is omitted from the bankruptcy petition, under the Bankruptcy Code, there are several possible solutions.

Initially, if the debtor realizes that a debt was overlooked during the bankruptcy, the debtor is required to file amended schedules and identify the creditor. If this happens, the bankruptcy attorney should be notified and he will amend the schedules.

If a pre-bankruptcy debt is discovered after the bankruptcy case has been closed and discharge granted, there are a couple of possible options. In some situations, it will be necessary to request that the bankruptcy court reopens the bankruptcy case and discharge the debt. In other situations, especially in no asset Chapter 7 Bankruptcy cases, the debt is considered discharged as a matter of law, even though it wasn’t listed in the schedules. Finally, some types of debt, such as student loans, cannot be discharged under most circumstances, and will survive the bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy courts expect the debtor to provide a full and complete disclosure of both assets and liabilities. In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy asset cases and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cases, an omission matters a great deal since listed creditors receive payments through the bankruptcy court. If a debtor deliberately fails to list a creditor, that debt is likely be declared non-dischargeable and will survived the bankruptcy. Under appropriate circumstances, courts have denied debtor a bankruptcy discharge because of the debtor’s intentional failure to list all debts or revoked already issued discharge.

Changes to New York’s Bankruptcy Exemptions

Back in July I have written about a pending bill which would have changed New York’s bankruptcy exemptions and allowed debtors to use the current federal exemptions or the exemptions in New York Law. At the time, it was impossible to predict whether the bill would ever become law.

On December 23, 2010, the bill was signed into law and will become effective in 30 days. This is the biggest change in New York’s bankruptcy exemptions in years, and will make a tremendous impact on the debtors filing both Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

Homestead Exemption Increases to $75,000 per person for those in Rochester and Western New York

Right now each homeowner can protect only $50,000 worth of equity in a house. However, for those living in Rochester and Western New York Counties, that amount will increase to $75,000. Since a married couple can combine their exemptions, that means that a couple will be able to protect a$150,000 worth of equity in their home.

This will enable almost any typical Rochester middle class family to file bankruptcy to eliminate their credit card debts while protecting their home. In my Rochester, New York, bankruptcy practice, I periodically meet with homeowners who are forced to file for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy instead of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy because they have too much equity in their homes. Now, almost everyone will be able to seek Chapter 7 Bankruptcy relief and keep and protect their homes.

Amounts for Almost All Other New York’s Exemptions Categories Are Being Increased and New Categories Are Being Added

The new law also increases the exemptions for many other assets such as cars, and adds some new categories like home computers and vehicles for the handicapped.

Comparison of New York’s Old and New, 2011 Bankruptcy Exemption Statutes

Existing New York State Bankruptcy Exemptions

NEW New York State Bankruptcy Exemptions

Homestead Exemption (note: this can be combined for married couples filing jointly, who own the real estate together)

$50,000

Homestead Exemption (note: this can be combined for married couples filing jointly, who own the real estate together)

$150,000 for property in the downstate New York (Counties of Nassau, Suffolk, Kings, Queens, Bronx, Richmond, Rockland, Westchester and Putnam)

$125,000 for property in the Counties of Dutchess, Albany, Columbia, Orange, Saratoga and Ulster

$75,000 for all other counties

Motor Vehicle

$2,400

Motor Vehicle

$4,000

Motor Vehicle equipped for use by a disabled person (new category)

$10,000

Cash Exemption if Homestead Exemption is taken

None

Cash Exemption if Homestead Exemption is taken

$1,000. (Note: New exemption. Can also be used for personal property. However, the Federal Exemption is much greater and allows debtors to protect much more in appropriate situations.)

Jewelry and Art

a wedding ring

a watch worth up to $35

Jewelry and Art

a wedding ring

a watch, jewelry and art worth up to a total of $1,000 (Notes: New exemption. This will make it much more difficult for trustees to seek payment for engagement rings)

Tools of Trade (these are the working tools and implements that are necessary to carry on one’s business)

$600

Tools of Trade (these are the working tools and implements that are necessary to carry on one’s business)

$3,000

Aggregate Individual Bankruptcy Exemption for Cash, Household Goods and Clothing

$5,000

Aggregate Individual Bankruptcy Exemption for Cash, Household Goods and Clothing

$10,000

The New and Increased Exemptions Will Benefit Future Bankruptcy Debtors

Not only will more consumers be able to file for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, but it will also help those debtors filing Chapter 13 Bankruptcy since they may be paying substantially less through their monthly Chapter 13 plan. In addition, existing Chapter 13 Bankruptcy debtors may be able to convert their cases to Chapter 7 and eliminate all future monthly payments.

I have attached a copy of the actual bill here.

Upcoming Changes In the Means Test

Once again, the means test figures for median income are changing as of November 1, 2010. Unfortunately, for a lot of jurisdictions it means that the amount of income that the debtor can have before being forced into a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is going to decrease.

Through October 31, 2010, a single debtor in New York could have $46,320 in income and still be able to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Starting November 1, 2010, that figure is dropping to $45,548. Similar declines will take place for all family sizes. The comparison of the existing and new income limits is below.

Old Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$46,320 $57,902 $69,174 $82,164

New Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$45,548 $56,845 $67,292 $82,587

* Add $7,500 for each individual in excess of 4.

While the income limit for a family of four has gone up slightly, for smaller families, the income limit has declined. For a family of three, the income limit will decline by nearly two thousand dollars.

The reason for a reduction in the median income is the decline in the American economy. Since the economy is down, employers pay less and employees earn less. As a result, the American median family income has dropped once again. As the income declined, so do the income limits for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. The unfortunate problem resulting from the recession is that as debtors make less money and have more financial problems, it becomes harder for them to qualify for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

Who Qualifies For Bankruptcy?

Do I qualify to file a bankruptcy? This is one of the most common questions I am asked as a bankruptcy lawyer when I meet with debtors who are hoping to obtain relief from their debts in bankruptcy court. My answer is usually yes, since almost everyone qualifies for bankruptcy under either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.

I think that this question is often asked because of common myths and misinformation that people hear with regard to what bankruptcy is and what it does for the debtor. Unfortunately, there is much misinformation being passed around. It is rare that someone would not qualify for a filing under either chapter of the Bankruptcy Code. If there are horror stories, they typically arise out of situations where someone did not disclose accurate information to the bankruptcy court.

In order to qualify for a bankruptcy relief, the debtor needs to have a reason to file. The primary reason for most debtors is their inability to pay their debts. Whether or not the debtor owns assets is not a a consideration in qualifying to file for bankruptcy. Under New York’s bankruptcy exemptions, a single filer can protect $50,000 in home equity, $2,400 of equity in the vehicle, and there are other exemptions available for other classes of assets.

There are no minimal requirement as to how much debt a debtor must have before filing, nor does this debt has to be reduced to a specific figure. Also, if you are filing Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, you are not limited with respect to the property that you can own, but the amount of property may be a factor in the amount of payments under the plan. While there are maximum limits of the amount of debt that can be discharged under either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, the vast majority of debtors will not even approach them. In Chapter 7, there are no maximum debt limits. As a result, that Chapter 7 Bankruptcy is available to the debtors regardless of how much debt they owe, and its availability is only limited by the means test. In Chapter 13, you may not have more than $1,010,650 in secured debt and $336,900 in unsecured debt.